Perform a Q-Sort Log In
 
 
The Q-Sort:
» Why Q-sort?
» InvestmentQ ™ Background
» Practical Application
» Research Findings
» Disclaimer
Conducting
a Q-Sort:
» How to Q-sort
» Interpreting your Results
» Privacy Protections
» Perform a Q-Sort
The InvestmentQ ™ Team:
» Academic Team
» FS Associates, Inc.
» Watson Wyatt
» Brandes Institute

Process Indicator Scales Summary

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Scale

Interpretation

Interpretation

Scale

Intellectual Structure

Strict adherence to established ways of thinking and managing

See problems from different angles; Willing to change course given new evidence

Flexibility

Sence of Control

Sense of organization and command

Sense of urgency or emergency

Crisis

Optimism

Confidence in ability to achieve goals

Concern or trepidation about achieving goals

Pessimism

Undirected

Less concentration of power in firm’s leader and less directive approach toward group members

Greater concentration of power in firm’s leader and more directive approach toward group members

Leader Control

Factionalism

Group members work individually –not always together

Group members work together as mutually supportive team

Cohesiveness

"Top-down" business process

General interests of the group take precedence

Individual interests of group members may take precedence

"Bottom-up" personal interests

Decentralized Group Power

Group less centrally controlled by an individual or subgroup

Group more centrally controlled by an individual or subgroup

Centralized Group Power

Risk Aversion

Group less willing to take calculated business risks

Group more willing to take calculated business risks

Risk Taking

In reviewing this table, keep in mind that process indicator scale scores at the extremes (closer to 1.0 or 9.0) provide the most useful information in characterizing the decision-making culture of an organization. Thus, scores close to 5.0 are not strong indicators.

For example, a score of 1.3 for the "Optimism vs. Pessimism" process indicator scale suggests an organization has "confidence" in its ability to achieve goals. A score of 8.2 suggests "concern or trepidation" about achieving goals. A score of 4.6 suggests neither confidence nor concern about achieving goals.

When comparing process indicator scales based on your input vs. a manager's input or the averages, incremental differences can be meaningful. In general, an absolute difference greater than 1.0 for any trait reflects a significant discrepancy in perceptions.

Copyright © 2004 - 2012 InvestmentQ ® All rights reserved